About Me

My photo
Travelalot, Vic, Qld, Cali, Australia
Like making old things new again. Enjoy working on a far away big tree/cow farm vs inner city digital stuff and with the NBN that's changing, creative lifestyles and digital content businesses. I have 4 degrees in psychology, media, literature, librarianship, management and business including a business PhD that explored how tech created opportunities in the music sector (as a lead indicator to other content sectors). Am fascinated by how people use digital stuff and emerging uses. Slow living, reject unreal or fast lifestyles, I like to know all about what I eat. Maintaining a professional hatred and boycott of Farcebook. Confused about whether to write in 1st or 3rd person on this site. Love animals and have always had them around - cows, horses, chooks, cats, dogs, sheep, goats, camels, budgies. Met lots of snakes too. Enjoy aesthetic immersion and favourite era is 1940-1959. Music obsessive not impartial to late nights watching bands. blah blah blah

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

copyright issue #1

Excerpts below from an email discussion group - contact me if you want the source:

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-mongols22-2008oct22,0,754213.story

..."But the most lasting blow to the San Gabriel Valley-based bikers may be down the road: In an unusual maneuver, the feds are also seeking to seize control of the Mongols' trademarked name, which is typically accompanied by its cherished insignia -- a ponytailed Genghis Khan-like figure riding a chopper. U.S. Attorney Thomas P. O'Brien said if his plan is successful, the government would take over ownership of the trademark, and anyone caught wearing a Mongols patch could have it seized by law enforcement on the spot.

"Not only are we going after the Mongols' motorcycles, we're going after their very identity," O'Brien said in a telephone interview early this morning. "We are using all the tools at our disposal to crush this violent gang.""


Imagine this scenario:
"excuse me, sir, you may not be aware of this, but the copyright for the tattoo on the back of your head is held by the US government; I'm going to have to ask you to remove that, or at least wear a hat."

Fortunately for him, the copy on his head (which is, by definition, a "copy" under the U.S. Copyright Act) is not an infringing copy, since it was "lawfully made" before the seizure. Whoever owns his head (hopefully the guy) is free to distribute it without the consent of the copyright owner (unless, according to the Ninth Circuit court of appeal, the tattoo was made ouside of the U.S., in which case the U.S. has a right to prohibit him - or at least his head- from entering the country, so he should limit his travels to domestic).

But he need not wear a hat so long as the display is not "public", and the law is written so that he can take his hat off in a restaurant, for example, but can't post the photo posted above here on the Internet. When he dies, the gravedigger will need U.S. Authorization to dispose of it.

No comments:

Followers